A very good day to you.

This is my little project in conjunction with the upcoming National Day. I would like to conduct an interview with you which the end result will be posted in my blog. If you wish, it can be posted in your own blog too.

The questions are as followed.

1. The British have left the country for 48 years, but many of their policies including the notorious Internal Security Act (ISA), divide and rule, restrictions on mother tongue education are still largely intact. In the aspects of press freedom and local election, it's much worse than it was 48 years ago. In your opinion, are we truly independent ?

2. Many including former teachers in Malay College Kuala Kangar hold the opinion that, the level of national unity and academic results were much better when the medium of instruction was English. Once it was switched to Bahasa, it's downhill all the way. Does this mean the national language cannot unite the citizens efficiently ?

3. Many blame the racial politics and racist policies as main culprits for national disunity. However, even without these, the national schools do not necessarily become the premier choice. Does this mean national unity is difficult to achieve ?

4. Social Contract which was created prior to independence has become the buzzword in town again. Unfortunately most of them wish to interpret it according to own preferences, for instance, Umno emphasis on the Special Malay Positions, while DAP emphasis on Malaysia being a secular state. In your opinion, is this Social Contract going to be relevant forever ? Would the thoughts of future generations be different ? If yes, which way ?

5. Liberals and fundamentalists have different interpretations on the role of Islam in the Constitution, in which its role was not clearly defined. Does Islam as the religion of the federation is only ceremonial and symbolic, or it should be the basis for all laws and policies ? In some countries for example Pakistan, it is stipulated in the Constitution that any article in the Constitution will be automatically invalid if it clashes with Al-Quran or Sunnah. Do you think we need to include this in our Constitution too ?

6. Between Constitution and Al-Quran, as well as human rights and Al-Quran, which is superior ? Constitution and human rights safeguard freedom of religion. Instead of being just a way of thoughts and rituals, Islam is also a way of life (ad-deen) and has its own legal system. Is the National Front (BN) government, which continues to forbid the enforcement of Hudud, Qisas and Takzir while claiming that Malaysia is a "Negara Islam", infringing its citizens' constitutional rights and human rights by restricting them from practising their religion ?

7. Can the Communists be considered as surrenderred, after the signing of Haadyai Peace Accord ? It was stated that the Communist members would be allowed to return, but many victims of their violent and terror acts opposed to it. How should the government decide ? Did the Communist play any role in gaining independence and national building ? If yes, please state.

8. Are the "20 Points" which was meant to protect Sabahans and Sarawakians interest still relevant ? What are the effects to national integration, politics, economics and society, if it is maintained, reviewed or abolished ?

9. Under the current administration, Malaysians tend to equate patrotism to flying of flags, konsert merdeka and fireworks show. Can you suggest any methods of celebration which can be more useful ? If yes, please state.

Please try your best to answer as many questions as possible in English, Bahasa or Chinese, and send me the reply by e-mail to before National Day, thank you.

Wish you a very happy National Day.

你好。

這是我的小小project,配合即將到來的國慶日,想做個專訪,基本上是作為我blog裡面的一篇文章。可是如果你願意讓我把同樣的文章放上去自己的blog那更好。

以下是此次專訪的問題。

1.我國已經將英國人趕走48年,但是各種英國人留下來的政策,如內案法,分而治之,限制母語教育等都保存的完好無缺,在限制新聞自由,地方政府選舉等方面更比英國人有過之而無不及。在這種情況下,我國是否算是真正有意義地獨立?

2.許多人,包括江沙馬來學院以前的老師都認為,從前學校使用英文的時代,國民團結的程度跟學業成績都很優秀,七十年代一改成國語就直線下滑。是否在我國,國語無法團結國民?

3.又有人認為,是種族政治及種族主義的政策導致國民不團結。但是,就算消除了種族政治及種族主義政策,國小仍然未必就成為全民的首選學校。那麼請問這是否會造成國民團結的目標難以達致?

4.許多人重提獨立時的社會契約。但是看起來各方面都只按照各自的喜好來詮釋。如巫統強調馬來人特別地位,行動黨強調世俗國,在你看來,這個所謂的社會契約是否永遠有效?未來的人思想是否會有可能轉變?如果有,請問是朝那方面轉變?

5.自由派和基本教義派對回教在憲法裡面扮演的角色有不同的解釋。憲法裡面自己沒有講清楚,到底作為國教的回教只有象徵性的意義,還是應該成為一切法律跟政策的依據?某些國家如巴基斯坦,憲法裡面注明,任何與可蘭經或聖訓相牴觸的條文自動失效。我國憲法是否有必要加入類似條文?

6.憲法和可蘭經,人權和可蘭經何者為上?憲法和人權都保障宗教自由。回教不只是一套思想和宗教儀式,還包括生活方式和法律。因此像國陣政府這樣,口頭上聲稱是回教國,但想儘辦法阻止實施回教刑事法,是否算是限制國民的人權及憲法所賦予的權利?

7.合艾和平協議簽訂以後,是否表示共產黨已經投降?和平協議裡面說明共產黨可以回國,可是許多從前因共產黨暴力事件受害的國民反對,政府應該如何取捨?共產黨在獨立建國的過程中是否有扮演任何角色?如果有,是什麼角色?

8.保障沙巴,砂勞越利益的<20條款>是否有仍然存在的必要?條款的存在,修改或廢除會對國民融合和政治,經濟,社會方面帶來什麼方面的影響? - 隱藏引用文字 -

9.在政府的愚民政策下,國人逐漸將愛國與掛國旗,國慶前夕演唱會和放煙花劃上等號。請問我們是否能舉辦或提倡更有意義的節目來慶祝國慶?如果有,請問是什麼?

有時間的話就請你儘量回答每一題,用中,英,國文都可以,請儘量在國慶日之前用 e-mail 回覆到

謝謝。

yours sincerely,

Jeffrey Lim

~ myshinshin.blogsome.com ~ ktmrailwayfan.com ~ keadilanrakyat.org ~
-- myshinshin01 : ymsger -- myshinshin : gtalk --